Skip to content
Straits
Degraded feedsOilstale 44mTransitslive 9h

StraitsRegionsEU

European Union & the Strait of Hormuz.

Europe's crude exposure to Hormuz is structurally low: Norway, the United States, and West Africa carry most of the import mix, and the post-2022 reshuffle accelerated that pattern. The larger exposure is on LNG: roughly 38% of EU gas imports originate in Qatar and transit the strait. A Hormuz closure therefore lands on Europe primarily as a gas-price shock and only secondarily as an oil-price shock. The IEA-coordinated 90-day reserve obligation gives the bloc the world's largest stockpile in aggregate, and the toolkit refined during the 2022 Russian gas cut-off (storage management, demand response, US LNG redirection) applies directly. Second-order exposure runs through refined-product imports from Indian and Korean refineries that themselves depend on Gulf crude; that arbitrage tightens before any Hormuz disruption reaches a European pump.

Strait status now

EFFECTIVELY CLOSED

Crude imports via Hormuz

14%

Daily import value at risk

$98M

at $73.34/bbl Brent

Strategic reserve

90d

days of net imports

Energy profile

Oil consumption
10.4 mbpd
Crude imports
9.5 mbpd
Hormuz crude dependency
14%
Hormuz LNG dependency
38%
Reserve days
90d
Reserve volume
1200 mbbl

Top suppliers

  1. 01Norway· largest, post-2022
  2. 02United States
  3. 03Kazakhstan
  4. 04Saudi Arabia
  5. 05Libya

Key facts

  • Crude exposure to Hormuz is the lowest among major importing blocs: Norway, the US, and West Africa supply the bulk.
  • LNG exposure is much higher: roughly 38% of LNG imports originate in Qatar.
  • IEA-coordinated 90-day reserve obligation across member states; combined reserves are the largest in the world.
  • Refining is concentrated at ARA (Antwerp-Rotterdam-Amsterdam) and Mediterranean clusters.
  • Post-2022 sanctions on Russian crude reshaped supply more than any earlier disruption; the LNG pivot toward Qatar and the US is the legacy.

Vulnerabilities

  • LNG side is the larger Hormuz exposure: Qatari cargoes feed gas-fired power and industrial demand.
  • Refined-product imports from Indian and Korean refiners depend on Hormuz upstream (second-order exposure).
  • Petrochemical feedstock chains are tightly linked to Gulf naphtha.

Mitigations

  • IEA-coordinated stockpile release is the established response mechanism (1991, 2005, 2011, 2022).
  • US LNG capacity additions through 2026 displace more Qatari volume each year.
  • Norwegian gas exports remain the system-critical backstop.
  • Storage levels for natural gas are now actively managed under EU regulation.

Historical context

Europe's post-2022 supply shock, the Russian gas cut-off, taught a different lesson than the 1970s oil shocks did. The crisis tools that worked in 2022 (LNG diversification, demand response, storage management) are the same instruments the bloc would deploy against a Hormuz closure, with Qatari LNG now sitting where Russian pipeline gas used to.